On 06/10/2020 17:34, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:46 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
On 06/10/2020 16:37, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> How does it break the API? It looks like a change of annotation.
> Shouldn't be a big deal unless I am misunderstanding something.
Please have a look at:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-October/062577.html
Looks like basically the same code. What does this break? Why the concern?
The C11/C++11 attribute syntax is less flexible compared to the GNU
attributes. For example:
echo "_Noreturn void ok(void);" > test.c
echo "void error(void) _Noreturn;" >> test.c
gcc test.c
test.c: In function ‘error’:
test.c:2:1: error: ‘_Noreturn’ in empty declaration
void error(void) _Noreturn;
^~~~
test.c:2:18: warning: empty declaration
void error(void) _Noreturn;
^~~~~~~~~
test.c:2:1: error: expected ‘{’ at end of input
void error(void) _Noreturn;
^~~~
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
