This looks OK. Push it. On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:06 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Provide RTEMS_NO_RETURN also in case RTEMS_DEBUG is defined to prevent > errors > like this: > > error: no return statement in function returning non-void > [-Werror=return-type] > > Use C11 and C++11 standard means to declare a no-return function. > > Close #4122. > --- > cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h > b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h > index c31b4ebef7..0244af1471 100644 > --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h > +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h > @@ -94,9 +94,11 @@ > * can impact the code generated following calls to > * rtems_fatal_error_occurred and _Terminate. > */ > -#if defined(RTEMS_SCHEDSIM) > - #define RTEMS_NO_RETURN > -#elif defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(RTEMS_DEBUG) > +#if __cplusplus >= 201103L > + #define RTEMS_NO_RETURN [[noreturn]] > +#elif __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L > + #define RTEMS_NO_RETURN _Noreturn > +#elif defined(__GNUC__) > #define RTEMS_NO_RETURN __attribute__((__noreturn__)) > #else > #define RTEMS_NO_RETURN > -- > 2.26.2 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel