Hello Niteesh, On 31/08/2020 08:23, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > Hello, > > I have submitted the final eval. > > Thank you, everyone, for all the support throughout the project.
Thank you for your work during GSoC 2020. > Though I couldn't > get any of my patches merged. I'm sure we manage to do that soon (as soon as the new build system is there). > I expect to spend a lot of time post-GSoC > to get > the work merged and contribute even more :). That would be great. Feel free to continue asking any questions that you have. Best regards Christian > > Thanks, > Niteesh. > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:46 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > looks great > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 6:55 AM Christian Mauderer > <o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> wrote: > > > > On 30/08/2020 14:38, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 4:12 PM Christian Mauderer > <o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>>> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Niteesh, > > > > > > On 30/08/2020 08:58, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I have updated the blog to contain the links to the commits > > > > instead of the branches. Please have a look again. > > > > https://gs-niteesh.github.io/finalreport/ > > > > > > >From my point of view, it looks good now. You missed the commit > > > with the > > > refactored i2c driver: > > > > > > Sorry about that. I fixed this. > > > > > > > > https://github.com/gs-niteesh/rtems/commit/be9bd605c40cf7cbcf3f527054fdbab2af39f52a > > > > > > But if you don't have time left it's not a problem if it > isn't there. > > > > > > The Submission guidelines tell that "It must be easy to > identify the > > > work you have done." From my point of view that was already > quite clear > > > because the commits are all on top of the final branch. But > Gedare is of > > > course right: Linking every commit is a bit more clear. > > > > > > > > > > And sorry to disturb on the weekend, but we have only about > > > > a day left before the submission deadline, so I request > > > > everyone to please take a look and let me know if you would > > > > like to change anything. > > > > > > No problem for disturbing in this case. Don't miss your > deadline. It's > > > better to submit something that is not perfect than not > submitting > > > anything. We would have no possibility to fix a missed > submission. > > > > > > > > > I have to submit it before tomorrow 11:30 PM IST. I'll leave it > tonight > > > for others to comment and will fill it tomorrow morning. > > > > Be really careful to not miss a deadline. Again: We have no chance of > > fixing a missed deadline. > > > > Best regards > > > > Christian > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Niteesh. > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Niteesh. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 2:24 AM Gedare Bloom > <ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> > > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 8:31 AM Christian Mauderer > > > > <o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29/08/2020 15:04, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 2:54 PM Christian Mauderer > > > > <o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>>> > > > > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Niteesh > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29/08/2020 11:22, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 1:02 PM Christian > Mauderer > > > > > > <o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>>> > > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>>>> > > > > > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>>> > > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> > > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de> > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29/08/2020 05:57, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:19 AM Gedare > Bloom > > > > > > <ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>> > > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>>> > > > > > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>> > > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>>>> > > > > > > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>> > > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>>> > > > > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> <mailto:ged...@rtems.org > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>> > > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are "Links to commits" 1-4 all the > code > > > you (are > > > > > > claiming you) > > > > > > > wrote? > > > > > > > > I just want to make sure. It looks > fine to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, all the code in the commits is > written by me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think maybe "Links to branches" would > be a better > > > > title. It > > > > > > is not a > > > > > > > single commit each but a few commits. > Alternative > > > > would be to > > > > > > add links > > > > > > > to each commit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have changed the title to "Links to branches". > > > Should I > > > > also add > > > > > > links > > > > > > > to the commits that were made in each phase > at the > > > end of the > > > > > > summary of > > > > > > > each phase? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want, you can do that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I did try that but it didn't work out well, especially > > > with the > > > > OFW commit. > > > > > > Since I don't have the old commit I either had to > leave that > > > > commit out > > > > > > in the first phase or I had to post the newer > commit in the > > > > first phase > > > > > > itself which actually should in the last phase. So I > > > decided to > > > > avoid adding > > > > > > the commits and just leave it out with the branches. > > > > > > > > > > That's OK too. Like I said: Main target was that > it's clear > > > that you > > > > > don't have four commits but a bit more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, I'm sorry I didn't notice this. We actually do > want it to be > > > > distinctly your commits. Since you have commits that > are older > > > than > > > > this GSoC in rtems, you can't use the author filtering > feature > > > > > > > > > (https://github.com/gs-niteesh/rtems/commits/beagle-rtems6-pinmux-18-aug?author=gs-niteesh) > > > > so you'll probably need to generate the links to each > commit. > > > > > > > > This is something required by Google. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The main point of that change was to highlight > that > > > it's not > > > > 4 commits > > > > > > but a bit more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It has been quite a bit of back and > forth during > > > this GSoC > > > > > > project so I > > > > > > > think the result is quite OK. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:07 PM > Niteesh G. S. > > > > > > > <niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>> > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>> > > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>>> > > > > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>> > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>> > > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>>>> > > > > > > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>> > > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>> > > > > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>> > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>>> > > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>> > > > > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>> > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>>>>>> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have prepared my final report > for my > > > > project. You > > > > > > can have a > > > > > > > > look at it > > > > > > > > > here > > > > https://gs-niteesh.github.io/finalreport/. Please > > > > > > kindly > > > > > > > > review the report. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Niteesh. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > devel mailing list > > > > > > > > devel@rtems.org > <mailto:devel@rtems.org> <mailto:devel@rtems.org > <mailto:devel@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org> > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org>>> > > > > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org> > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org> > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org>>>> > > > > > > <mailto:devel@rtems.org > <mailto:devel@rtems.org> <mailto:devel@rtems.org > <mailto:devel@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org> > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org>>> > > > > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org> > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org>> > > > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org> > <mailto:devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org>>>>> > > > > > > > > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- -------------------------------------------- embedded brains GmbH Herr Christian Mauderer Dornierstr. 4 D-82178 Puchheim Germany email: christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de Phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 18 Fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 PGP: Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
