Hello, On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 2:54 PM Christian Mauderer <o...@c-mauderer.de> wrote:
> Hello Niteesh > > On 29/08/2020 11:22, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 1:02 PM Christian Mauderer <o...@c-mauderer.de > > <mailto:o...@c-mauderer.de>> wrote: > > > > On 29/08/2020 05:57, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:19 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org> > > > <mailto:ged...@rtems.org <mailto:ged...@rtems.org>>> wrote: > > > > > > Are "Links to commits" 1-4 all the code you (are claiming you) > > wrote? > > > I just want to make sure. It looks fine to me. > > > > > > Yes, all the code in the commits is written by me. > > > > I think maybe "Links to branches" would be a better title. It is not > a > > single commit each but a few commits. Alternative would be to add > links > > to each commit. > > > > > > I have changed the title to "Links to branches". Should I also add links > > to the commits that were made in each phase at the end of the summary of > > each phase? > > > > If you want, you can do that. > I did try that but it didn't work out well, especially with the OFW commit. Since I don't have the old commit I either had to leave that commit out in the first phase or I had to post the newer commit in the first phase itself which actually should in the last phase. So I decided to avoid adding the commits and just leave it out with the branches. The main point of that change was to highlight that it's not 4 commits > but a bit more. > > > > > > > > > > > It has been quite a bit of back and forth during this GSoC project > so I > > think the result is quite OK. > > > > Best regards > > > > Christian > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:07 PM Niteesh G. S. > > <niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com> > > > <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com <mailto:niteesh...@gmail.com>>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I have prepared my final report for my project. You can have > a > > > look at it > > > > here https://gs-niteesh.github.io/finalreport/. Please > kindly > > > review the report. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Niteesh. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > devel mailing list > > > devel@rtems.org <mailto:devel@rtems.org> > > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
