I would. Thank you.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:24 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 04/08/2020 16:23, Richi Dubey wrote:
> > Thanks.
> >
> > So for the code:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > for (i = 0; i < CPU_COUNT; ++i) {
> > const Per_CPU_Control *c;
> > const Thread_Control *h;
> >
> > c = _Per_CPU_Get_by_index(CPU_COUNT - 1 - i);
> > h = c->heir;
> >
> > sc = rtems_task_suspend(h->Object.id);
> > rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL);
> > }
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > would it have the same effect if we replace all this by :
> >
> > for (i = CPU_COUNT -1 ; i >=0 ; --i) {
> > sc = rtems_task_suspend(ctx->task_ids[i]);
> > rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL);
> > }
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Please let me know.
>
> No, it would not have the same effect in general. You can try to change
> it and see if the test fails or not.
>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
> PGP : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
