On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 4:25 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee
<vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020, 3:45 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>> Use in tester to allow defining custom rtems_version
>> to use in tools.
>>
>> Closes #3671.
>
>
> Looks like someone else was also chasing this bug with a similar approach ;)
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-April/059001.html
>
Yeah, we could have collaborated on IRC! :)
Am discussing briefly the approaches taken with Chris.
>
>
>> ---
>> rtemstoolkit/options.py | 1 +
>> tester/rtems/version.cfg | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/options.py b/rtemstoolkit/options.py
>> index 32a7016..e991bc8 100644
>> --- a/rtemstoolkit/options.py
>> +++ b/rtemstoolkit/options.py
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ class command_line(object):
>> self.long_opts = {
>> # key macro handler
>> param defs init
>> '--jobs' : ('_jobs', self._lo_jobs,
>> True, 'default', True),
>> + '--rtems-version' : ('rtems_version', self._lo_string,
>> True, None, False),
>> '--log' : ('_logfile', self._lo_string,
>> True, None, False),
>> '--macros' : ('_macros', self._lo_string,
>> True, None, False),
>> '--force' : ('_force', self._lo_bool,
>> False, '0', True),
>> diff --git a/tester/rtems/version.cfg b/tester/rtems/version.cfg
>> index 2cd9073..0ca057e 100644
>> --- a/tester/rtems/version.cfg
>> +++ b/tester/rtems/version.cfg
>> @@ -32,4 +32,6 @@
>> # RTEMS Version
>> #
>>
>> -%define rtems_version 5
>> +%if ! %{defined rtems_version}
>> + %define rtems_version 5
>> +%endif
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
