On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 12:21 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> I liked it better before, when the test prints nothing if it is > successful. I think this is the trend we are heading toward in rtems > tests. > > I will incorporate more changes to the test so there is minimal printing if the test is successful The test is originally written by @Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varo...@gmail.com> it would require to do minor changes in the previous parts of the test as well should i do that ?? > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:46 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I ran the code using qemu for risc-v architecture. > > The value of r = 0 for the function to run without error > > while the error is raised when the value is not matched with the correct > value defined in > > rtems_test_assert(). > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
