----- Am 3. Feb 2020 um 7:12 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: > On 3/2/20 4:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> ----- Am 3. Feb 2020 um 1:14 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: >> >>> On 2/2/20 1:28 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> ----- Am 20. Jan 2020 um 6:01 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: >>>> >>>>> On 17/12/19 4:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>>>> My experience tells me that doing a BSP development without a debugger >>>>>> is a >>>>>> waste of time. >>>>> >>>>> Sometimes getting a working debugger is more effort than getting a BSP to >>>>> work. >>>>> The Pi is an example. I believe Alan used print statements. >>>> >>>> Ok, what do you think about a new configuration option: >>>> >>>> CONFIGURE_ENABLE_VERBOSE_INITIALIZATION >>> >>> CONFIGURE_ENABLE_VERBOSE_SYS_INIT ? >> >> In v2 of the patch set I named it CONFIGURE_VERBOSE_INITIALIZATION. I am not >> in >> favour of abbreviations, since they are in general not used in the >> configuration options. > > Sure. > >> More precise would be CONFIGURE_VERBOSE_SYSTEM_INITIALIZATION. It is longer, >> but >> would be not the longest configuration option name (e.g. >> CONFIGURE_APPLICATION_NEEDS_CONSOLE_DRIVER is longer). So, what about this >> one? > > Yes CONFIGURE_VERBOSE_SYSTEM_INITIALIZATION is OK, the original could imply > more > to a new user.
Ok, I will change the name to CONFIGURE_VERBOSE_SYSTEM_INITIALIZATION. Anything else which needs to be addressed before I push the patch set? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
