On 3/2/20 4:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > ----- Am 3. Feb 2020 um 1:14 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: > >> On 2/2/20 1:28 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> ----- Am 20. Jan 2020 um 6:01 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: >>> >>>> On 17/12/19 4:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>>> My experience tells me that doing a BSP development without a debugger is >>>>> a >>>>> waste of time. >>>> >>>> Sometimes getting a working debugger is more effort than getting a BSP to >>>> work. >>>> The Pi is an example. I believe Alan used print statements. >>> >>> Ok, what do you think about a new configuration option: >>> >>> CONFIGURE_ENABLE_VERBOSE_INITIALIZATION >> >> CONFIGURE_ENABLE_VERBOSE_SYS_INIT ? > > In v2 of the patch set I named it CONFIGURE_VERBOSE_INITIALIZATION. I am not > in favour of abbreviations, since they are in general not used in the > configuration options.
Sure. > More precise would be CONFIGURE_VERBOSE_SYSTEM_INITIALIZATION. It is longer, > but would be not the longest configuration option name (e.g. > CONFIGURE_APPLICATION_NEEDS_CONSOLE_DRIVER is longer). So, what about this > one? Yes CONFIGURE_VERBOSE_SYSTEM_INITIALIZATION is OK, the original could imply more to a new user. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
