On 25/9/19 1:08 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:41 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 10:18 AM <dufa...@hda.com> wrote: >>>> On Sep 21, 2019, at 11:03 , Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 9:55 AM Peter Dufault <dufa...@hda.com> wrote: >>>> I’ve searched but can’t find anywhere. I’d like to see the results of the >>>> tests on all architectures to compare to what I see on PowerPC-beatnik. >>>> There is a build@ mailing list and the archives are at >>>> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/ >>>> There should be results from at least me for psim. >>>> You are encouraged to subscribe to the list and post results. Many boards >>>> have no results. >>> That doesn’t look like what I want. I’m looking for something like the >>> following (a small snippet of my test run in progress) to see what failures >>> are shared by what board support packages. >>> >>> [141/597] p:128 f:7 u:2 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: telnetd01.exe >>> [142/597] p:129 f:7 u:2 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios.exe >>> [143/597] p:129 f:7 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios01.exe >>> [144/597] p:129 f:8 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios02.exe >>> [145/597] p:129 f:9 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios03.exe >>> [146/597] p:130 f:9 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios04.exe >>> [147/597] p:131 f:9 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios05.exe >> >> Most are for tools builds. I have a script I run periodically which includes >> tools and bsps. This is a psim results post: >> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2019-August/002973.html >> >> It shows the failures but still doesn't show the in process view. Does that >> help at all? >> > Just to jump in, as I recall the "in process" view is not always > useful, since it does not exactly tell you what has failed (when you > run several tests in parallel, that is). Collecting the end results > of could be nice.
Sorry, I am not following what is being said here. The tester collects the results for a single run as shown in ... https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2019-August/002970.html which is ... Summary ======= Passed: 578 Failed: 2 User Input: 6 Expected Fail: 0 Indeterminate: 0 Benchmark: 3 Timeout: 0 Invalid: 0 Wrong Version: 0 Wrong Build: 0 Wrong Tools: 0 ------------------ Total: 589 Failures: dl06.exe dl09.exe User Input: dl10.exe monitor.exe termios.exe top.exe capture.exe fileio.exe Benchmark: dhrystone.exe linpack.exe whetstone.exe Are you asking for something across separate runs of the tester? > Automating this and creating a colored status matrix > would be a nice little project for someone. Where would this be run and the data held? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
