> On Sep 21, 2019, at 17:49 , <dufa...@hda.com> <dufa...@hda.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sep 21, 2019, at 16:41 , Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> On 22/9/19 1:18 am, dufa...@hda.com wrote: >>>> On Sep 21, 2019, at 11:03 , Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 9:55 AM Peter Dufault <dufa...@hda.com> wrote: >>>> I’ve searched but can’t find anywhere. I’d like to see the results of the >>>> tests on all architectures to compare to what I see on PowerPC-beatnik. >>>> >>>> There is a build@ mailing list and the archives are at >>>> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/ >>>> >>>> There should be results from at least me for psim. >>>> >>>> You are encouraged to subscribe to the list and post results. Many boards >>>> have no results. >>>> >>> That doesn’t look like what I want. I’m looking for something like the >>> following (a small snippet of my test run in progress) to see what failures >>> are shared by what board support packages. >>> >>> [141/597] p:128 f:7 u:2 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: telnetd01.exe >>> [142/597] p:129 f:7 u:2 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios.exe >>> [143/597] p:129 f:7 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios01.exe >>> [144/597] p:129 f:8 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios02.exe >>> [145/597] p:129 f:9 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios03.exe >>> [146/597] p:130 f:9 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios04.exe >>> [147/597] p:131 f:9 u:3 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:0 i:0 W:0 | >>> powerpc/beatnik: termios05.exe >> >> The --log option should place all the test results in a log. Is that what >> you want? >> >> There are other options that let you log the console data as well. This is >> disabled by default to make the log more compact. >> > > I want a collection of results for all tested BSPs so that I can compare what > I’m seeing with “beatnik” with others. > > I thought there was a collection of systems that went through automated > tests, an RTEMS testing lab of sorts. Am I confused? I was ready to try to > get an MVME5500 and whatever else was needed to the lab. > Beatnik finished: [595/597] p:563 f:19 u:6 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:1 i:2 W:0 | powerpc/beatnik: tmonetoone.exe [596/597] p:564 f:19 u:6 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:1 i:2 W:0 | powerpc/beatnik: tmoverhd.exe [597/597] p:565 f:19 u:6 e:0 I:0 B:3 t:1 i:2 W:0 | powerpc/beatnik: tmtimer01.exe Passed: 565 Failed: 20 User Input: 6 Expected Fail: 0 Indeterminate: 0 Benchmark: 3 Timeout: 1 Invalid: 2 Wrong Version: 0 Wrong Build: 0 Wrong Tools: 0 ------------------ Total: 597 Average test time: 0:00:20.652608 Testing time : 3:25:29.607257 Traceback (most recent call last): File "../rtems-tools/tester/rt/cmd-test.py", line 42, in <module> test.run(sys.argv[1:], command_path = base) File "/home/dufault/development/rtems/rtems-tools/tester/rt/test.py", line 455, in run for report_format in report_formats: TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable
Peter ----------------- Peter Dufault HD Associates, Inc. Software and System Engineering This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols subject to interception and tampering. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
