On 5/8/19 2:41 am, Christian Mauderer wrote: > I'm still not entirely happy with the pinmux because it re-initializes > some pins that are already initialized by the BSP. But if no one has a > better idea that can be done in a reasonable time I would accept it like > it is. I think I would prefer it without the hack that needs an extra > overlay. If the patch set is committed in this form, we will need a > ticket for that (wait with creating it till the commit) so that a future > project can work on that ticket.
This is a sensible approach. Thanks Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
