> On Jul 19, 2019, at 01:21 , Sebastian Huber > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > A <bsp/io.h> sounds like a good approach. Finding all users of these defines > is a bit of work. They are used by shared code, so every BSP which uses this > shared code needs the new header file.
That is mostly addressed by rebuilding all PowerPC BSPs since only the PowerPC BSPs <bsp.h> will change and I would do that. I suppose there are optionally configured code paths that won’t be found that way. Searching for the use of all affected definitions below “powerpc” and checking for an include of <libcpu/io.h> is better but more than I want to do. The other code that can’t be checked is end-user code that includes <bsp.h> but not <libcpu/io.h>. That’s always an issue, though. Peter ----------------- Peter Dufault HD Associates, Inc. Software and System Engineering This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols subject to interception and tampering. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
