On 17/07/2019 23:42, dufa...@hda.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2019, at 01:48 , Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
Hello Peter,
On 16/07/2019 19:58, Peter Dufault wrote:
I have a build failure with the MVME5500 “beatnik” BSP. Therefore I tried to build the
“psim” BSP and have the same failure: the FreeBSD PowerPC “cpufunc.h” and the RTEMS
PowerPC “io.h” headers both define static inline "eioeio()" functions.
- RTEMS, libbsd, RSB and the build tools are up-to-date as of this AM.
- Building for arm xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu succeeds.
- I’ll work-around it but I believe I must have something locally screwed up, I
can't find any recent changes associated with this.
libbsd doesn't work for all BSPs. For each new BSP you there are probably some things
to fix and adjust. I think the <bsp.h> should not include the low level io.h
header file. The only powerpc BSP that supported by libbsd is the qoriq.
First an easy question: what rtems-libbsd branch is best to work with: master
or 5-freebsd-12?
For production systems I would use 5-freebsd-12. I regularly
synchronize it with the FreeBSD stable/12 branch.
As for properly fixing the include of libcpu/io.h:
This fix is clear:
- Any .c file below bsps/powerpc/shared/ that need it should include
libcpu/io.h directly. The header is in bsps/powerpc/include/ and both are
below bsps/powerpc.
Yes.
This fix is not clear:
- There are .c files in bsps/shared that reference e.g. “inport_byte()” (e.g.
bsps/shared/dev/rtc/mc146818a_ioreg.c). There are definitions of “inport_byte()” in
cpukit/score headers for x86 architectures and in bsp.h headers for PowerPC (arm/gumstix,
powerpc/beatnik, powerpc/motorola_powerpc). For PowerPC the definition is based on
what’s in "libcpu/io.h”. The PowerPC definition of “inport_byte()" should be
moved from bsp.h into bsps/powerpc/shared/libcpu/io.h, but then I don’t know the right
way to get that header included in the bsps/shared code, there isn’t something like
“bsps/shared/include” where a definition could go (and count on proper configuration of
the BSPs for everything to link properly).
I would move the
#define outport_byte(port,value) outb(value,port)
#define outport_word(port,value) outw(value,port)
#define outport_long(port,value) outl(value,port)
#define inport_byte(port,value) (value = inb(port))
#define inport_word(port,value) (value = inw(port))
#define inport_long(port,value) (value = inl(port))
from the PowerPC <bsp.h> to <libcpu/io.h>.
As an aside, mc146818a_ioreg.c is brittle. It requires that “inport_byte" be a
macro and if its definition is moved out of bsp.h the code will not compile properly:
#include <rtems.h>
#include <bsp.h>
#include <libchip/rtc.h>
#include <libchip/mc146818a.h>
/*
* At this point, not all CPUs or BSPs have defined in/out port routines.
*/
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__PPC__)
#if defined(inport_byte)
...
Use
#ifdef __PPC__
#include <libcpu/io.h>
#endif
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel