On 13/03/2019 14:39, Joel Sherrill wrote:


On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:38 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:

    What about this patch? The placement of rtems_board_support_package()
    into <rtems/version.h> is a bit odd, but I think it fits into the
    scope
    of these functions. You normally include <rtems/version.h> if you
    want
    to print some system information. Another place would be <rtems.h>
    right
    after rtems_get_version_string().


I think it is OK although I agree with you it is odd.

If these are intended to be public APIs, I do not see any documentation for
them in rtems-docs.

All functions in this header are not in rtems-docs so far. I guess the primary use case is test meta-data output.

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to