Am 19.12.18 um 10:46 schrieb Chris Johns: > On 19/12/18 8:20 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> I think you are discussing some other bug(s) than the one I originally >> meant. > > Yes we are discussing something else that is wrong with the docs builds. Sorry > about hijacking the thread. >
No problem. I was just worried that you might want to put work into fixing something that isn't the problem. Of course it sounds like it _is_ a bug but it is not the one that I meant. >> First of all: I tried a pdf build. But I receive the same error >> on a html build. > > I do not see this error. > >> See attached log for the complete output with python2 >> on the current HEAD (75f24638b3f). > > I cannot see what is wrong. There is a waf configure option to add verbose > levels to `sphinx-build`. I suggest you add '-v -v' to see if it can provide > some insight to the problem. > > The waf script glob's the directory. Is there something in your tree which is > getting picked up? For some odd reason, the sphinx on my system expects a contents.rst instead of a index.rst. Is seems like the master_doc in common/conf.py is somehow ignored. If I do the following before the build, everything works fine: for f in **/index.rst; do ln -s index.rst "`echo $f | sed 's/index.rst/contents.rst/'`"; done My sphinx version is 1.8.1. > >> What I meant is a simple indentation error in common/waf.py. Python 3 >> seems to be a little picky about these. It throws a "TabError: >> inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation". I'll post a patch >> for review in a few minutes. > > I understood this and thanks for the patch. Please push it. Pushed. > >> Regarding the ticket: I updated the title and added a comment to reflect >> the fact that multiple repos are affected. > > Thanks. > >> I'll update the waf in libbsd soon. I haven't tested examples-v2 yet so >> this will need some more time. And I won't update rtems-docs till I'm >> able to build it. I'll also post a patch for review that will update the >> rtems-tools in RSB to use the new version. > > Thanks Libbsd is updated. For some reason the ticket in Track hasn't picked up the change. Did I make some error in the description? https://git.rtems.org/rtems-libbsd/commit/?id=91566dda7f52b5eba04df159770b4797ba652f20 > > Chris > Best regards, Christian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
