On 18/12/2018 07:38, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 2:21 PM Christian Mauderer <l...@c-mauderer.de > <mailto:l...@c-mauderer.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have trouble building rtems-tools (via source builder) on an > Arch-Linux machine with a Python 3.7. I searched for the problem and > found out that it is due to an old waf version in the rtems-tools repo. > The bug is fixed since 9 months and newer versions of waf don't have a > problem with it (see [1]). > > Now I noted that we already have four repositories with different > versions of waf: > > - rtems-docs: waf 1.9.7 > - rtems-libbsd: waf 2.0.1 > - rtems-tools: waf 1.9.9 > - examples-v2: waf 2.0.1 > > There is quite some potential that we get some more repos. I don't have > a problem to create four patches to update them to 2.0.13 now. But I'm > not sure whether it is an ideal solution to pack waf with every repo. > What do you think?
Waf is a build system framework and if we do not package it in a repo does it mean we support any version of waf? There are bug fixes in later releases and I feel updating our copies is the best solution. > Are there any good alternatives? > > Please update all four. I like having waf bundled so we at least a baseline. > Examples and libbsd matxh because I made them match by adding from examples to > libbsd. > > Bump them please. > Yes please. This ticket covers rtems-tools and should be fine for this change ... https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3569 Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
