On 23/11/2018 17:34, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 23/11/2018 07:13, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 23/11/2018 16:58, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 15/11/2018 14:10, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> Copied from: >>>> >>>> https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html >>>> >>>> The formatting is suitable for C/C++ source comments. >>>> >>>> Update #3053. >>> It would be nice if this patch could be reviewed. It would be quite bad if >>> we >>> have an error in this template file. >>> >> Yes. >> >> Should https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause be the reference? > > I got some private mails from FreeBSD developers as a result of this question: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2018-October/053447.html >
OK. > This let me to change the URL in v2 of this patch to spdx.org which is > maintained by the Linux Foundation instead of OSI. Sure. >> >> They are the same so the SPDX link can also be provided but it is about data >> exchange. >> >> Does this file need a context to explain it's purpose in the RTEMS kernel >> source >> tree? > > Maybe something like this: > > "This license file serves as a template for the license header in files." .. Copy to the top of source the file as a comment and update the year and copyright fields ... or something like this. Thanks Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
