On 23/11/2018 07:13, Chris Johns wrote:
On 23/11/2018 16:58, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 15/11/2018 14:10, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Copied from:
https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html
The formatting is suitable for C/C++ source comments.
Update #3053.
It would be nice if this patch could be reviewed. It would be quite bad if we
have an error in this template file.
Yes.
Should https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause be the reference?
I got some private mails from FreeBSD developers as a result of this
question:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2018-October/053447.html
This let me to change the URL in v2 of this patch to spdx.org which is
maintained by the Linux Foundation instead of OSI.
They are the same so the SPDX link can also be provided but it is about data
exchange.
Does this file need a context to explain it's purpose in the RTEMS kernel source
tree?
Maybe something like this:
"This license file serves as a template for the license header in files."
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
