On 30/07/2018 15:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 30/07/18 02:49, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 27/07/2018 23:01, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 27/07/18 14:53, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> On 27/07/18 14:49, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>>>> OK. Should this kind of announcement go to users@? >>>> RTEMS 5 will be the first release with a corresponding libbsd branch, e.g. >>>> there is no 4.11 branch in libbsd. >>> Ok, this is wrong. There is a 4.11 branch in libbsd. I am not sure if there >>> exists someone who cares about this branch. Maybe we should delete it. >>> >> Please do not delete the branch. The 4.11.3 release contains the libbsd >> package. >> >> I can remove libbsd from the 4.11.4 release but I cannot go back in time and >> remove it from the previous releases. Let me know if you think libbsd should >> not >> be in any future 4.11 releases. > > The libbsd on the 4.11 branch is based on FreeBSD 9.3. Here the callout > implementation is different and this bug is not present. > > Since we have now this libbsd on the 4.11 branch I think we can keep it. I > don't > have time to maintain it. >
Sorry, I cannot follow this. Should I create a libbsd package on the next 4.11 release? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
