On 02/05/18 13:18, Joel Sherrill wrote:


On Wed, May 2, 2018, 12:13 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:

    On 30/04/18 23:36, Joel Sherrill wrote:
    > While teaching the class last week, I got the privilege of
    adapting on
    > the fly to the new layout. Mostly went well but I made some notes on
    > some directories in cpukit whose placement seems inconsistent with
    > other similar directories. I thought I would toss out my list
    and see
    > what others thought.
    >
    > + rhealstone not under benchmarks
    >
    > + libz is a top level directory but xz is under libmisc
    >
    > + libpci is not under dev
    >
    > + drvmgr is not under dev
    >
    > + libi2c (yes legacy) is not under dev
    >
    > + devnull is not under dev
    >
    > + fb is not under dev
    >
    > + mouse is not under dev
    >
    > + fsmount under libfs?
    >
    > I think that's it from my notes. Any comments or thoughts?

    I would leave the source files in cpukit where they are. A proper
    file
    history is more important than a fancy directory layout from my
    point of
    view

Doesn't got keep history with moves and renames?

It works to some extent. You usually need a --follow command line option. It is not completely transparent.

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to