On 30/04/18 23:36, Joel Sherrill wrote:
While teaching the class last week, I got the privilege of adapting on
the fly to the new layout. Mostly went well but I made some notes on
some directories in cpukit whose placement seems inconsistent with
other similar directories. I thought I would toss out my list and see
what others thought.
+ rhealstone not under benchmarks
+ libz is a top level directory but xz is under libmisc
+ libpci is not under dev
+ drvmgr is not under dev
+ libi2c (yes legacy) is not under dev
+ devnull is not under dev
+ fb is not under dev
+ mouse is not under dev
+ fsmount under libfs?
I think that's it from my notes. Any comments or thoughts?
I would leave the source files in cpukit where they are. A proper file
history is more important than a fancy directory layout from my point of
view.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
