On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On 10/11/2017 03:45, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > Just to be clear, we won't have a 5.0.0 release, will we? Are we also > going to > > the two digit release numbers? > > No. The wiki page had 'minor release dot number' which was not that clear. > I > have updated the page to have 'version dot release number'. > > > > > The RSB change shows it is 5, which means the next branch will be 6. > > > > There was something, I cannot find it. rtems5.0 makes sense and rtems5.1 > for the > actual release makes sense. > > > Is this what we are doing? > > Not that I know of. > Then the current tools target does not match what you are describing. Either we are doing two digit releases and the target is right. Or we are continuing three digit release numbers and it is wrong. :) I am confused. > > Chris >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
