On 18/10/17 4:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/10/17 21:34, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 17/10/17 4:44 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Tool name will be "rtems5", e.g. arm-rtems5-gcc. >> Why not rtems5.0 and then rtems5.1? > > We don't have different tool versions for bugfix releases, e.g there are n0> > 4.11.0, 4.11.1, 4.11.2, ... tools. It is just 4.11. With the new number > scheme, > this is just 5.
Ah OK we have rtems5 for all development branches from now on for 5. > >> >> Do we have the tool naming written up any where? > > No, not yet. > >> >>> Next release will 5.1.0. Branch version after release will be 5.1.1. >>> Next master will be 6.0.0. >> I have added a section to the wiki >> )https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Release#ReleaseNumbering) and added >> these files. >> >> Can we please make sure we add anything we touch to this section so we can >> create an accurate procedure? > > Could we please move this content from the wiki into a Git repository? Do we > really need a separate repository for this release stuff? Could we move this > into the RTEMS repository as a replacement for the Makefile.maint? Yes. I had a name for it but I cannot put my hands on it. I will look for it tomorrow. >> >> How is this change coordinated so we keep the window the tools, kernel, and >> libraries are not working as small as possible? > > I don't know. I guess we have to figure this out and update the > documentation/scripts accordingly. > OK and thanks. It is good to know the expectations. Maybe we get a suitable plan in place first? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
