On Oct 9, 2017 6:30 PM, "Chris Johns" <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
On 9/10/17 4:01 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 09/10/17 02:32, Chris Johns wrote: > >> [...] >> How does a user use C11 threads on RTEMS for real applications? When I last >> looked I could not see a way to configure any runtime parameters like stack or >> priority. > > You can do this in an implementation-specifc way via the native_handle(): > > http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/thread/native_handle > This is C++ threads. I didn't see anything like that for C11 threads. <sigh> How does this help a user with portable C++ code move an application to RTEMS? I see this requiring users track the C++ instances with some form of run-time profile and none of that will be portable. They seem to be focused on parallel work loads than real-time threads with specific run-time profiles. I would recommend unlimited objects as a first measure. But we have asked users who care to count object instances for years. Just making it clear they are C11 threads. They shouldn't care how they are implemented Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
