On 08/10/17 22:31, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
We have a precedence of presenting an abstracted notion of
configuring an object. Users should not have to know how something
is implemented in RTEMS. We don't address the configuration of
C11 threading objects in this way.
Given the implementation, I proposes we add CONFIGURE_C11_MAXIMUM_THREADS
I would consider the C11/C++11 threads just as a wrapper to POSIX
threads. You cannot prevent that C11/C++11 threads to consume your POSIX
threads and vice versa. This makes such a configuration option a bit
unreliable.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
