On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 11/09/17 16:03, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> ----- Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> schrieb: >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sebastian Huber < >>> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, but why do you think that this is an error? We can share the >>>> synchronization objects among processes. >>>> >>> We don't have processes. How do you propose to share between >>> processes when RTEMS is fundamentally a single process system. >> >> Yes, its a single process system. So, it is very easy to support sharing >> between processes. Why should creating a process-shared synchronization >> object fail only because its impossible to create a second process? >> > > I would like to remove this process-shared error also from the other POSIX > synchronization objects: > > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3125 > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3126 > Do these process-shared synch objects work properly when used in a single process on *nix?
> -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
