On Sep 12, 2017 11:56 PM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
On 12/09/17 17:07, Joel Sherrill wrote: Sure. I still think it is wrong for an RTEMS application to set it to > shared since there isn't another process to share it with but it seems to > be compliant. > This makes porting of applications not originally designed for RTEMS a bit easier. Ok. Not sure why they would set pshared to 1 if they really didn't want to share it though. Change it. Just think it is questionable application programming -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornier <https://maps.google.com/?q=ess+:+Dornier&entry=gmail&source=g>str. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
