On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 16/05/17 15:45, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Sebastian Huber < >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de <mailto:sebastian.huber@embedd >> ed-brains.de>> wrote: >> >> FYI >> >> I guess for RTEMS we should use "powerpcspe-rtems*-*". Is it >> possible to use the RTEMS "powerpc" directories with such a >> target? We had an "arm-rtemseabi*" maybe due to some >> configure/automake limitations. So, maybe "powerpc-rtemsspe*"? >> >> >> I personally think the GCC discussions which put SPE as part of the OS >> name are >> horribly incorrect. SPE is an architecture variant and the pattern for >> configure >> triples is very well defined. The pattern is >> ARCHITECTURE-VENDOR-OS[version] >> >> I would prefer powerpcspe-rtemsVERSION. >> >> On the sharing the code issue, how much gets shared? How do you envision >> this impacting the RTEMS tree? Split the PowerPC port like GCC? Or just >> somehow magically build the same powerpc directories two different ways? >> > > The reason for this split in GCC is that IBM is no longer willing to > maintain the stuff from Freescale/NXP/Qualcomm. There is no reason to do > this split in RTEMS. I didn't either except for the purity of matching directories to tool architectures. So it will be configure magic to subset the BSPs I suppose. > > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
