On 16/05/17 15:45, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
FYI
I guess for RTEMS we should use "powerpcspe-rtems*-*". Is it
possible to use the RTEMS "powerpc" directories with such a
target? We had an "arm-rtemseabi*" maybe due to some
configure/automake limitations. So, maybe "powerpc-rtemsspe*"?
I personally think the GCC discussions which put SPE as part of the OS
name are
horribly incorrect. SPE is an architecture variant and the pattern for
configure
triples is very well defined. The pattern is
ARCHITECTURE-VENDOR-OS[version]
I would prefer powerpcspe-rtemsVERSION.
On the sharing the code issue, how much gets shared? How do you envision
this impacting the RTEMS tree? Split the PowerPC port like GCC? Or just
somehow magically build the same powerpc directories two different ways?
The reason for this split in GCC is that IBM is no longer willing to
maintain the stuff from Freescale/NXP/Qualcomm. There is no reason to do
this split in RTEMS.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
