On Mar 7, 2016 12:03 AM, "Sebastian Huber" < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > > On 06/03/16 19:17, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> Sebastian may have more general SMP ideas but the initial push for SMP gave us great support on a subset of BSPs and architectures and left gaps on others. > > > working on SMP improvements is a bit difficult currently since I will work in this area nearly full time in the next half a year or so. I hope that Darshit Shah will work on the SMP scheduler optimizations for the arbitrary processor affinities in GSoC 2016. > > Adding SMP support to a specific BSP for an architecture that already supports SMP (ARM, PowerPC, SPARC) is not enough for a GSoC project. Even adding SMP support to new architectures shouldn't be a big deal.
The x86 has enough issues to keep someone busy for a summer. Also just because you can do something quickly doesn't mean a student can. :) > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
