On 03/07, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,On 06/03/16 19:17, Joel Sherrill wrote:Sebastian may have more general SMP ideas but the initial push for SMP gave us great support on a subset of BSPs and architectures and left gaps on others.working on SMP improvements is a bit difficult currently since I will work in this area nearly full time in the next half a year or so. I hope that Darshit Shah will work on the SMP scheduler optimizations for the arbitrary processor affinities in GSoC 2016.
Yes, I do intend to work on providing better APA Scheduling Support for RTEMS over the summer. The existind Priority SMP Scheduler already supports processor affinities, but the new implementation should allow for better schedulability. I'll send a more detailed email outlining my thoughts and ideas soon.
Adding SMP support to a specific BSP for an architecture that already supports SMP (ARM, PowerPC, SPARC) is not enough for a GSoC project. Even adding SMP support to new architectures shouldn't be a big deal.-- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- Thanking You, Darshit Shah
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
