On 28/02/16 00:07, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi,
Should we create branches for 4.9 and 4.10 in the RSB repo?
Should the 4.9, 4.10 and 4.11 build set files and config scripts be
removed from master?
I do not see the point of maintaining the branches for releases and the
master and I can see a situation where the 4.11 build on master, ie
currently 4.12, is wrong but noticeable so.
In case branches are used, then we should remove the corresponding
versions from the master. Giving users the option to build the tools for
4.10 from the master */4.10 directory or the 4.10 branch makes no sense.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
