On Feb 27, 2016 5:08 PM, "Chris Johns" <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Should we create branches for 4.9 and 4.10 in the RSB repo? > > Should the 4.9, 4.10 and 4.11 build set files and config scripts be > removed from master?
As long as we keep branches for them. FWIW I wouldn't be opposed to RSB branches for even older releases if a user submitted them. > I do not see the point of maintaining the branches for releases and the > master and I can see a situation where the 4.11 build on master, ie > currently 4.12, is wrong but noticeable so. If RTEMS has a branch, the RSB should follow. Master should be 4.12 only. > Chris > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
