On 28/12/15 19:14, Martin Galvan wrote:
Hi everyone! We're still looking into the issue Marcos described here:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-December/013216.html
We noticed the problem seems to go away if we set the ticker interrupt
priority to be the same as for the other interrupts. While that's not
a definitive fix, I was wondering if anyone knows why is it necessary
that the ticker interrupt has a lower priority than the rest.
Its not necessary, but in most cases it is desirable since the system
tick is not related to a low-latency hardware event.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
