On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Martin Galvan <martin.gal...@tallertechnologies.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >> A couple of odd guesses. If there are non-RTEMS interrupts, they must >> be the highest priority. > > Precisely, I'd like to know why the ticker interrupt must always have > a lower priority.
Particularly, we'd like to know what would happen if we set the ticker interrupt priority to the same as the rest. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
