On 5/11/2015 6:56 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > I see no problem with using the newer GCC assuming our development > cycle is probably still at least 1yr+. Until we get good automation > this is the case. Also, we are planning to apply to Google Code-In, > and bumping the tool versions could be a set of tasks. If you would > like to do one or a few as a sample, then we can have high school > students do the rest during the GCI program period.
I am planing to talk to Joel about the RSB and it's configuration files. The RSB has arrived at an interesting place where I am not sure we want all versions in an RSB. If we strip back the configurations to just the valid ones we will then need to have a specific versions for specific releases. This would simplify the number of files. It would be nice to resolve this before adding 4.12 support. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
