Hi Sebastian, I see no problem with using the newer GCC assuming our development cycle is probably still at least 1yr+. Until we get good automation this is the case. Also, we are planning to apply to Google Code-In, and bumping the tool versions could be a set of tasks. If you would like to do one or a few as a sample, then we can have high school students do the rest during the GCI program period.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to add the tools for RTEMS 4.12 to the RSB. The question is > which GCC version should we use? Since our release process is so slow I tend > to use GCC 6 since it includes support for OpenMP and C++11 threads out of > the box. I use it currently for development and it works quite good at least > on ARM and PowerPC. > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
