I don't it's a language issue: https://ideone.com/k1vz5d El 30/7/2015 10:51, "Gedare Bloom" <ged...@gwu.edu> escribió:
> OK, I guess this makes the convention "minimize parentheses" mandatory > if we want C++11. I guess the basic problem is that constructions > where a single atom is in parens may produce different results now. At > least an error is emitted rather than silent optimization.. > > -Gedare > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Sebastian Huber > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > please have a look at the following bug: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67064 > > > > This is really nice in combination with defines and macros that use ( ) > to > > make sure the content stays together. > > > > -- > > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > > PGP : Public key available on request. > > > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
