OK, I guess this makes the convention "minimize parentheses" mandatory if we want C++11. I guess the basic problem is that constructions where a single atom is in parens may produce different results now. At least an error is emitted rather than silent optimization..
-Gedare On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > please have a look at the following bug: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67064 > > This is really nice in combination with defines and macros that use ( ) to > make sure the content stays together. > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
