On 3/23/2015 4:38 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 24/03/2015 4:55 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> On March 23, 2015 12:01:55 PM CDT, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >>> Joel, >>> >>> I think the snapshot should contain this patch now. We should switch >>> over to it, and start testing for release. >> Ageed. AFAIK this is a good snapshot to start the freezing process with. >> Please update to use it and I will start a to build when I get home. >> > Great to move back to a snapshot and thanks for pinging Jeff. There > maybe a chance of one more snapshot. It will depend on Sebastian's > current newlib patches. +1 It should be easy to bump to a later snapshot. Some of the trouble I have was some of the RSB and rtems-tools waf issues you fixed where (from my perspective) it would just randomly die. >> We still have a gdb issue though. There are approximately two dozen patches >> we want against 7.9. It is all Jiri's work. I don't think we want to wait >> for a 7.9.1 since half are still on their mailing list pending. >> >> Can the RSB handle that many patches? > Yes it should. And it does nicely. If someone builds sparc tools today, they are in place.
Only issue is that the sparc-rtems4.11-run command does not take a -leon2 or -leon3 argument. You have to use sis or gdb to get access to them. But the rtems-tester and sim-scripts know how to do that. >> I am prone to add them. I could flatten them into one. And put all into >> rtems - tools. Would that work? Just trying to narrow down issues. > My only comment is once in the rtems-tools repo they are difficult to > remove so a smaller number of patches keeps the repo a little cleaner. > > It would be good to get this moving again. I added all the patches. It is now done. :) > Chris --joel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
