I didn't have time to switch to the snapshot today. -Gedare
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 24/03/2015 4:55 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> >> On March 23, 2015 12:01:55 PM CDT, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >>> >>> Joel, >>> >>> I think the snapshot should contain this patch now. We should switch >>> over to it, and start testing for release. >> >> >> Ageed. AFAIK this is a good snapshot to start the freezing process with. >> Please update to use it and I will start a to build when I get home. >> > > Great to move back to a snapshot and thanks for pinging Jeff. There maybe a > chance of one more snapshot. It will depend on Sebastian's current newlib > patches. > >> We still have a gdb issue though. There are approximately two dozen >> patches we want against 7.9. It is all Jiri's work. I don't think we want to >> wait for a 7.9.1 since half are still on their mailing list pending. >> >> Can the RSB handle that many patches? > > > Yes it should. > >> I am prone to add them. I could flatten them into one. And put all into >> rtems - tools. Would that work? Just trying to narrow down issues. > > > My only comment is once in the rtems-tools repo they are difficult to remove > so a smaller number of patches keeps the repo a little cleaner. > > It would be good to get this moving again. > > Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
