Hi All, Thank you very much for all the pointers! I will go through all these material and get up to speed with them.
Cheers, - Charith On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Amar Takhar <a...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 2015-03-24 12:13 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > In did my experiments with the pc386 BSP. If clang/llvm has improved the > SPARC > > support, one of those BSPs might be an option. It didn't have any SPARC > v7/v8 > > support when I looked last. > > I was thinking pc386 and SPARC would work. > > > > Having an easy to test on, well known BSP would be valuable. A new BSP > could > > take most of the summer and not get to the tool issues. The tool issues > are > > important here. > > I wasn't suggesting the BSP be written. I meant to add that as a GSoC > project > I'll go ahead and do that now. > > > Amar. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
