On 2015-03-24 12:13 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote: > In did my experiments with the pc386 BSP. If clang/llvm has improved the > SPARC > support, one of those BSPs might be an option. It didn't have any SPARC v7/v8 > support when I looked last.
I was thinking pc386 and SPARC would work. > Having an easy to test on, well known BSP would be valuable. A new BSP could > take most of the summer and not get to the tool issues. The tool issues are > important here. I wasn't suggesting the BSP be written. I meant to add that as a GSoC project I'll go ahead and do that now. Amar. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
