On 02/25/2015 09:38 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 24/02/15 22:48, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Sebastian,
Do you know if #1247 is still valid for current RTEMS and newlib?
Gedare
This is still valid.
Can you prove this claim?
The problem with this bug is that nobody ever has come up with a proof,
which rendered it a "wild unproven claim", though it's not unlikely this
problem exists.
I think one of the reasons nobody touched this so
far is that the usage of locks will likely break all application
configurations.
No. The issue behind this is nobody having a proof and therefore nobody
having any idea about what to do.
- Nothing ("Cygwin doesn't seem to have any problems").
- Changing newlib?
- Inserting locks into RTEMS?
Ralf
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
