On 26/02/15 15:54, Martin Galvan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>Hello Martin,
>
>sorry, I should have look at your bsp-start-init-registers.s earlier. This
>stuff looks so generic, that it should go directly into start.S. I guess the
>TMS570 will not remain the only ARM core with a lockstep feature.
Thanks for the feedback. So that means I should discard the
BSP_START_NEEDS_REGISTER_INITIALIZATION symbol altogether and
unconditionally call the bsp_start_init_registers routines in
arm/shared/start/start.S?
No, the define is fine, since we need this code sequence only in certain
cases.
I still think the routines themselves should be kept on a separate .S
file, though, if only to keep start.S as short and clean as possible.
If you want to keep them in a separate file, then please move the file
to the shared folder. I don't think this stuff is really BSP specific.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel