On 1/14/2015 12:58 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > As it turned out in the discussion of > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64576 > > in GCC 5 we have a change of the default language > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html > > Lets see if this was the only problem. Based on the overnight results, that may be the only compilation issue.
+ A few arm BSPs have tests that don't fit into memory + A few PowerPC BSPs have compilation issues + or1ksim complains about _init/_fini --joel > On 13/01/15 16:52, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On 1/13/2015 12:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> Since this worked for a long time, this might be a CPP regression, but a >>>> %1 parameter doesn't really look like a C construct. >> I filed this as GCC PR 64576 and am doing a git bisect now. >> >> I would like to get a ruling and/or suggestion for it. This code >> is 15 years old so gcc has accepted it a LONG time. -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
