As it turned out in the discussion of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64576
in GCC 5 we have a change of the default language
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html
Lets see if this was the only problem.
On 13/01/15 16:52, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 1/13/2015 12:11 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>Since this worked for a long time, this might be a CPP regression, but a
>%1 parameter doesn't really look like a C construct.
I filed this as GCC PR 64576 and am doing a git bisect now.
I would like to get a ruling and/or suggestion for it. This code
is 15 years old so gcc has accepted it a LONG time.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
