On Wednesday, July 1st, 2026 at 14:16, Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I certainly do, but lately the idea of "worse is better" has taken > > > root here. > > > > This is uncharitable rhetoric. I understand you may be frustrated, but > > you won't be winning friends and influencing upstreams by rubbing > > blanket blame like this. > > > > And the other approaches haven't worked either. "Uncharitable" implies > lack of evidence or experience, but this has been the experience for > *years*. As a semi-outsider, I would like to see the Fedora community set standards for excellence. There are certain tradeoffs that can be avoided, if decisions are carefully made. A careful selection of packages would also help prevent packager workloads from increasing significantly over time, and various issues regarding unmaintained packages could probably also be avoided, if careful precaution is taken through the judgement of individual packagers. I believe this would be the best way to improve the culture of Fedora moving forward, since it will make the distribution as a whole more robust. Sent with Proton Mail secure email. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
