On 2026/02/16 12:55, Michel Lind wrote:
The numbers for those without pagure activity is lower (305 vs 606),
but that still means potentially 301 packagers let Packit handle all
their builds and never kick off a build by hand.
IDK if that's great or scary.
That confused me initially as well, but the numbers are subset of each
other, i.e. 305 of the 606. But letting packit handle the builds is by
design in that workflow. As long as the activity from PR is correctly
attributed, then it should be fine, and it would reflect the actual
activity of the maintainers of that package including packit doing the
automation in Koji and Bodhi.
If there were the case that there is really nobody overseeing the PRs,
then I would argue that it should be caught as complete inactivity and
the workflow on that package should be revisited.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
